General thoughts, ideas, and musings

Scandal: Kerry Washington’s New Show

April 9th, 2012

 

Always in search of Blactresses (Black actresses) and Blactors (Black actors), I mentioned before that Kerry Washington would be on your television every week, staring in the new series set in Washington, D.C.  Scandal, ABC’s new Spring show, created by Shonda Rimes, the creator of Grey’s Anatomy premiered a couple weeks ago.

I watched it online this weekend and provide the link below for the scene that made me want to tune in at least until the 4th week.   I’ll reserve my critique for next week, after a couple more episodes, but I will comment that the show isn’t awful.  I’m not sure yet if it’s going to be melodramatic dribble, but I’ll keep you posted.

Check it out for yourself and we’ll meet back here at the top of next week.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Open Letter to Gene Marks

11 January 2012

An open letter from guest contributor: Ashante Reese

Mr. Marks,

As an anthropologist and an educator who taught middle school in inner city Atlanta, I am writing because I am deeply concerned about issues of social justice. Your recent article, “If I Were a Poor Black Kid” has received many comments and replies, and from your responses to comments on Forbes, it is clear that you feel very strongly about what you wrote. I, too, feel very strongly about what you wrote, but not in the same ways as you.

Some have critiqued you because your being a white male writing about what poor black kids should and, presumably, could do is a reflection of privilege. Though I take this as an important point, I am less concerned with this particular aspect. Anthropology demonstrates that while we can’t fully “understand” someone else’s plight, we can gain insight into other people’s lives and ways of being over time. I believe issues on inequality are everyone’s problem; so you, as a white man, can ethically write about poor black kids, however, one must be educated about the conditions, history, and dynamism involved in existing in the world as poor, as black, as gendered (a dynamic you gloss over in your work), and as an adolescent who lives at the intersection of those complex social categories.

Others have responded with an account of how your article infuriated them, because of the underlying assumption that there is “something wrong” with poor black kids. However, I would rather not delve into my emotional response. Instead, I would like to address what appears to me to be your faulty logic. I have outlined my points below:

  • Individual Responsibility and Collective Action One of the primary, illogical ideas you promote in this article is that the responsibility falls squarely on children. As a former middle school teacher, I certainly believe kids, depending on age, have varying degrees of responsibility in their education. However, this responsibility you speak on in this article is so decontextualized that it is hard for me to make much sense of it. Most kids—regardless of race or class—rely on their parents for most needs and most often have to get permission to do most of the things you’re suggesting in your article. Individual responsibility at any age needs to be framed in such a way that balances that with collective action. After all, no one really gets to where they’re trying to go simply by working hard, right? Parents matter. Social, economic, and cultural capital matter, and these things vary based on who a person is, what s/he has access to, and who s/he knows. Let’s face it. We live in a world where people like to take credit for their actions but don’t always recognize the folks that helped them get to where they’re going. Yet, your article lacks any talk about collective responsibility or action, and in fact, you largely let yourself off the hook. You speak of their problems as if they are not your own. Maybe they are not; and if you can say that—that they are not your problems—that is a privilege in itself.
  • Knowing Better Equals Doing Better? Mr. Marks, do you ever do things that you know you shouldn’t do but you do them anyway? Like eat an extra cookie? Skip out on work to do something that’s more enjoyable? You know these things aren’t right, but you do them anyway. Yet, no one is lambasting you about your choices. There is an assumption that knowing=doing. Well it doesn’t. And there are a lot of reasons for that, not the least of which is the fact that knowing doesn’t translate into having the resources to do, and—whether you want to really grapple with this or not—some people really do start several paces behind others. You mention that the greatest challenge of our time is ignorance not inequality. I don’t have time or space to really critique that as much as I want, but I will say this: there are people who rise in the face on inequality; who end up being successful in spite of. I am one of those people. But I would be a fool to think that just because I did it someone else will or can, because let’s face it, if inequality didn’t matter, no one would be poor.
  • Wait, Why Did You Choose Poor Black Kids Anyway? Lastly, I’m trying to figure out why you choose to focus on poor black kids anyway. Is it because you already believe there is some deficiency, something that needs to be remedied in this sect of poor kids? Is it that poor kids of other races/ethnicities have “figured it out” yet black kids have not? I read President Obama’s speech that you allude to in your opening, and not once does he mention black kids. In fact, he doesn’t mention race as a factor that perpetuates inequality (sidenote: he should have). Perhaps you know that race matters when talking about inequality. But I doubt it. Nothing in your article gives me reason to believe that. So I’m trying to figure out why you did. Are you feeding into the polemical black/white divide that so much research and articles feed into? Do you view poor black kids in a particular light that renders other poor kids invisible? I’m really struggling with this, because you never provide your reasoning, and as a scholar who is interested in the intersections of race and class (and other social constructions), I would love to know how you came to this decision that you fail to justify in the article.

Your article is socially irresponsible. While not a New York Times front page article, doing some research before writing it would have been beneficial…  Based on your responses in the comment section of your own article and that of others posted on the internet, I get the impression that you are not willing to learn more about why so many people think your article was irresponsible and inaccurate. However, if you happen to be interested in learning more about race and class, please let me know. I know brilliant scholars who study this material without making normative claims about what children “should do.”

You say that you believe that it takes love, care, and help from adults and communities: Where do you fit in, Mr. Marks?

Sincerely,
Ashanté M. Reese

The Mystification of Poverty: Or the IMF and World Bank’s Poverty Monster

September 24th, 2011

Dear IMF and World Bank,

I saw this on the side of the World Bank yesterday and I had to take a picture of it and pose a few questions to you.  Why is it little girls’ responsibility to fight the “poverty monster”?  And you do realize that poverty isn’t a monster, right?  It’s real.


Why are you mystifying the processes of economic exploitation and colonialism–the things that produce poverty in the first place–through the production of this type of imagery?  And why do women have to do everything?  Are men going to take up some responsibilities now that women and girls are going to school?  Where’s that campaign?

Am I suggesting that little girls shouldn’t have access to education?  No, I’m not.  I’m just asking if you really think that more Westernized education does anything for them other than make them better resources from which to extract labor and capital in this global economy where the wealthiest 1% tell us where, how, and what to do to make them more money.

Poverty is not a hairy four eyed monster and no amount of reading can cause it to end if the people who help to perpetuate it, like yourselves, don’t stop making it out to be this thing that we can just end with through the “power of our minds.”

I’m not Jean Grey or Professor Charles Xavier, and neither are little girls in Sudan.

We can’t make people do things with the power of our minds.  As many people of color who are continually discriminated against in the workforce (and in comic books) can attest, it doesn’t always matter if you graduate from college (or have super powers), you can still be unemployed, disempowered, and completely disillusioned in the current global economy.  A systemic shift in the way that capital and labor are distributed needs to be the way to end poverty because little girls of color, they aren’t superheros.  They can’t make it rain…

Only Storm can do that… and she’s not real.

One Love,
“Doctor” Lane

P.S. A poverty monster? Who came up with that?  Bad idea.

Deeply White: Rembrandt Promises to “Whiten on the inside and out”

September 8th, 2012

I found this commercial at best, simply an ill-thought out attempt to be clever, and at worst, a complete and utter lack of consciousness about the still very present and active processes of ethnocentrism and racism which seek to stamp out difference; both literally and figuratively, whiten.

Then again, maybe it’s just a commercial… right? Maybe it’s really not that deep.

But cultural products take place within very specific contexts and social forces.   To say that this is “just a commercial” is to not recognize that all symbols, all choices of representation and presentation are just that, choices.

Graffiti is often associated with social ills.  Gangs.  Dark bodies.  Vandalism.  Young, scary dark children destroying property.  The commercial adopts the view of graffiti as a problem.  As vandalism.  As something out of place and wrong.  Dark and disorderly, and in need of being cleaned up, like plaque.

To not recognize that graffiti only works in this commercial when you imagine it in this way, is to not recognize that whiteness as pure, perfect, and devoid of all color; without stain or impurity, still reigns as the dominant ideology within the American visual lexicon.  They suggest their toothpaste, in an especially charming civilized British accent, as the solution to not only rid oneself of the stains on the outside of the tooth, but to fix it at the core as well.

To others however, graffiti is the artwork of disenfranchised youth in urban centers, and artwork which blossomed during the “Golden Age of Hip Hop”.  From this perspective, you can react with wonder when you see 10 feet tags on the craziest and hardest to reach places around the city and think on those kids who just want to be recognized and noticed as being and existing.  You can applaud them for their talent and resourcefulness, and be thankful that it’s not your garage door they tagged.

And if you have this perspective, then you know that Rembrandt and ever other toothpaste is full of crap because teeth just aren’t white.  They’re more of an eggshell.  Off white.  A shade of tan.  No matter how much you brush.  And those people who do have freakishly bright smiles?  They cheated.  They had some fancy procedure done that most of us can’t afford.  White teeth, like pure and unstained white bodies, do not exist in nature.  Certainly not after you eat that peppery salad for lunch, because you are going to have some green and black in between a couple of your teeth no matter what shade you are.  And those are the breaks.

The White Girl Mob: or Why I Really Miss Teena Marie

I’ll be honest, it took me several Youtube videos and a few more Google searches to realize that Kreayshawn was actually serious.  It took me even more time to realize that V-Nasty was serious.  She truly believes that she’s a rapper.  If you transcribe her freestyles however more than half the “rhymes” are the b-word and the n-word in some combination.  When I think about the way that I feel about Teena Marie’s performance of a music form that was made by Black people, her respect for the music and the people, I’m just sad that Kreayshawn and V-Nasty, and their White Girl Mob even exist.

I can admit that the “Gucci Gucci” song by Kreayshawn is pretty catchy, but most of her stuff isn’t.  V-Nasty’s work is just bad and there’s no way around that.  But this post isn’t just about that their music isn’t very good.  It’s also about what is happening in the world that would make it such that you have a group of white women rapping, thinking that it is perfectly acceptable to refer to people as “n-words,” and willing to refer to themselves as the “white girl mob.”

That they grew up amidst urban poverty and blight along with other poor children of color is not a surprise, nor is the way that they talk, or that they found hip-hop as a way of expressing themselves.  I suppose what surprises me is that no one mentioned to them that they shouldn’t use the n-word no matter how many Black people they grew up with, or how many times they went to juvy (which V-Nasty seems especially proud about).  Eminem learned that.  Eminem is about 15 years farther into his career.  Closer to the Rodney King incident that led to riots around the country, closer to common sense, and some consciousness around the nature of race relations and even he had to come to the realization that he shouldn’t use it (now if we can get him to stop saying the f-word).

If the White Girl Mob is emblematic of anything, it is the declining understanding of race and that is terrifying.  Terrifying to think that they feel so far removed from white privilege and the benefits they receive from the institution of racism that they would refer to themselves and (mostly white) cronies as a “mob” and go around launching n-words.  Time hasn’t fixed racism.  Time has made us forget what racism looks like.  Time has made us forget that we have the words to express what it feels like and the tools to fight it.

If I could write letters to Kreayshawn, V-Nasty and the White Girl Mob, here’s what I’d say:

A Series of Letters to Kreayshawn, V-Nasty, and the Whole White Girl Mob

Dear Kreayshawn, V-Nasty, and the whole White Girl Mob: Have you ever heard of the Klu Klux Klan?  Or have you ever heard of the lynching of Jesse Washington in Waco, Texas?  An angry mob of white people lynched him, castrated him, and burned him alive.  Pictures of his chard corpse were made into postcards.  See below.

Dear Kreayshawn, V-Nasty and the whole White Girl Mob: Don’t call yourself a mob… and don’t use the n-word.  Do those two things, not because you’re responsible for the murder of Black women and men a hundred years ago, but because whether you like it or not, it happened in this country and the perpetrators looked like you and used the same language you’re using.  And the language you’re using is rather terrifying because it sounds like you’re talking to me.

Dear Kreayshawn, V-Nasty and the whole White Girl Mob: When Martin Luther King, Jr. said he dreamed of little white kids and black kids playing together in the streets, I don’t think he dreamed of V-Nasty posting up on a ’74 Cutlass on switches throwing out the n-word in every other sentence with her white DJ backing her up while she calls the people who she offends “haters.”

Dear Kreayshawn, V-Nasty and the whole White Girl Mob: I am hating on you.  I hate that you think you’re closer to the “street” than I am when I know that to be far from the truth.  Don’t let my college degree fool you, a bonafide African American tried and true in the ghettos of the south speaks to you.  Not only do I hate the n-word because the beliefs built into it continue to be used as one of many justifications of institutionalized racism including the creation of poor Black suburban and urban areas, but I also hate that you think you’re “hood” and therefore have permission to call me an n-word.  I hate that.

Dear Kreayshawn, V-Nasty and the whole White Girl Mob: You demonstrate the risk of getting to know Black cultural products without getting to know their significance or the history of those who created the art form.  You are quintessentially what we have to look forward to if we don’t teach the history of race in this country: white kids growing up thinking that the n-word is “just an expression” that doesn’t offend anyone.  You are wrong. 

P.S. I am four generations away from slavery and there was a time when I could say I was one generation away from a time when it was okay for white people to call me a “n-word,” but I can no longer say that.